Comparing Predictive Accuracy
Francis X. Diebold, Robert S. Mariano
NBER Technical Working Paper No. 169
Using research designs patterned after randomized experiments, many recent economic studies examine outcome measures for treatment groups and comparison groups that are not randomly assigned. By using variation in explanatory variables generated by changes in state laws, government draft mechanisms, or other means, these studies obtain variation that is readily examined and is plausibly exogenous. This paper describes the advantages of these studies and suggests how they can be improved. It also provides aids in judging the validity of inferences they draw. Design complications such as multiple treatment and comparison groups and multiple pre- or post-intervention observations are advocated.
Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/t0169
Published: Journal of Business and Economic Statistics (1995), vol. 13, pp. 253-265.
Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these: