201 Dowman Drive
Atlanta, GA 30322
Institutional Affiliation: Duke University
NBER Working Papers and Publications
|June 2017||A Framework for Sharing Confidential Research Data, Applied to Investigating Differential Pay by Race in the U. S. Government|
with Andrés F. Barrientos, Tom Balmat, Jerome P. Reiter, John M. de Figueiredo, Ashwin Machanavajjhala, Yan Chen, Charles Kneifel, Mark DeLong: w23534
Data stewards seeking to provide access to large-scale social science data face a difficult challenge. They have to share data in ways that protect privacy and confidentiality, are informative for many analyses and purposes, and are relatively straightforward to use by data analysts. We present a framework for addressing this challenge. The framework uses an integrated system that includes fully synthetic data intended for wide access, coupled with means for approved users to access the confidential data via secure remote access solutions, glued together by verification servers that allow users to assess the quality of their analyses with the synthetic data. We apply this framework to data on the careers of employees of the U. S. federal government,
studying differentials in pay by race. ...
Published: Barrientos, Andres F., Alexander Bolton, Tom Balmat, Jerome P. Reiter, John M. de Figueiredo, Ashwin Machanavajjhala, Yan Chen, Charley Kneifel, and Mark DeLong (2018). “A Framework for Sharing Confidential Research Data, Applied to Investigating Differential Pay by Race in the U.S. Government,” Annals of Applied Statistics 12(2): 1124-1156.
|December 2016||Elections, Ideology, and Turnover in the U.S. Federal Government|
with John M. de Figueiredo, David E. Lewis: w22932
A defining feature of public sector employment is the regular change in elected leadership. Yet, we know little about how elections influence careers. We describe how elections can alter policy outputs and disrupt civil servants’ influence over agency decisions, potentially shaping their career choices. We use new data on federal career records between 1988 and 2011 to evaluate how elections influence turnover decisions. We find large levels of stability in the civil service but also pockets of employees that are responsive to presidential transitions. Senior career employees in agencies with views divergent from the president’s appear most affected. In the first three years of an administration, political factors such as elections, policy priorities, and political ideological differences,...
Published: Alexander Bolton & John M. De Figueiredo & David Lewis, 2018. "Elections, Ideology, and Turnover in the U.S. Federal Government," Academy of Management Proceedings, vol 2018(1).