NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
loading...

Labor Market Outcomes and Postsecondary Accountability: Are Imperfect Metrics Better than None?

Veronica Minaya, Judith Scott-Clayton

NBER Working Paper No. 22880
Issued in December 2016
NBER Program(s):Economics of Education

Policymakers at the state and federal level are increasingly pushing to hold institutions accountable for the labor market outcomes of their students. There is no consensus, however, on how such measures should be constructed, or how the choice of measure may affect the resulting institutional ratings. Using state administrative data that links postsecondary transcripts and in-state quarterly earnings and unemployment records over more than a decade, we construct a variety of possible institution-level labor market outcome metrics. We then explore how sensitive institutional ratings are to the choice of labor market metric, length of follow-up, and inclusion of adjustments for student characteristics. We also examine how labor market metrics compare to the academic-outcome-based metrics that are more commonly incorporated into state accountability systems. We conclude that labor market data provides information that is quite distinct from students’ academic outcomes. Institutional ratings based on labor market outcomes, however, are quite sensitive to the specific metric. The choice of metric and length of follow up appear to matter much more than compositional adjustments. Our findings suggest a cautious approach: while a mix of feasible labor market metrics may be better than none, reliance on a single metric, especially if measured very early, may undermine policymakers’ ongoing efforts to accurately quantify institutional performance.

download in pdf format
   (402 K)

email paper

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w22880

Forthcoming: Labor Market Outcomes and Postsecondary Accountability: Are Imperfect Metrics Better than None?, Veronica Minaya, Judith Scott-Clayton. in Productivity in Higher Education, Hoxby and Stange. 2018

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
Zimmerman w22900 Elite Colleges and Upward Mobility to Top Jobs and Top Incomes
Carrell and Kurlaender w22904 Estimating the Productivity of Community Colleges in Paving the Road to Four-Year Success
Bayer and Charles w22797 Divergent Paths: Structural Change, Economic Rank, and the Evolution of Black-White Earnings Differences, 1940-2014
Cullen, Hanushek, Phelan, and Rivkin w22881 Performance Information and Personnel Decisions in the Public Sector: The Case of School Principals
Carrell and Sacerdote w19031 Why Do College Going Interventions Work?
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Themes
Data
People
About

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us