Housing Productivity and the Social Cost of Land-Use Restrictions
We use metro-level variation in both land and non-land input prices to test and estimate a housing production function and differences in local factor productivity. The econometric model implies that the typical cost share of land is one-third, and substitution with non-land inputs is inelastic. More stringent geographic and regulatory constraints increase housing prices relative to input costs. Disaggregated analysis finds state-level constraints are costliest, and provide a Regulatory Cost Index (RCI) independent of demand factors. Housing productivity falls with city population. The costs of land-use regulations outweigh associated quality-of-life benefits.
This paper was revised on July 12, 2016
Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w18110
Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these: