NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

Globalization and Dirty Industries: Do Pollution Havens Matter?

Jean-Marie Grether, Jaime de Melo

NBER Working Paper No. 9776
Issued in June 2003
NBER Program(s):   EEE   ITI

This paper reviews arguments and evidence on the impact of globalization on the environment, then presents evidence on production and international trade flows in five heavily polluting industries for 52 countries over the period 1981-98. A new decomposition of revealed comparative advantage (RCA) according to geographical origin reveals a delocalization to the South for all heavily polluting industries except non-ferrous metals that exhibits South-North delocalization in accordance with factor-abundance driven response to a reduction in trade barriers. Panel estimation of a gravity model of bilateral trade on the same data set reveals that, on average, polluting industries have higher barriers-to-trade costs (except non-ferrous metals with significantly lower barriers to trade) and little evidence of delocalization in response to a North-South regulatory gap.

download in pdf format
   (375 K)

email paper

This paper is available as PDF (375 K) or via email.

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w9776

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Frankel w10090 The Environment and Globalization
Grossman and Krueger w3914 Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement
Antweiler, Copeland, and Taylor w6707 Is Free Trade Good for the Environment?
Smarzynska Javorcik and Wei w8465 Pollution Havens and Foreign Direct Investment: Dirty Secret or Popular Myth?
Frankel and Rose w9201 Is Trade Good or Bad for the Environment? Sorting Out the Causality
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Data
People
About

Support
National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us