Dynamic Scoring: A Progress Report on Why, When, and How
By design, official budget estimates for legislative proposals generally exclude the proposals’ likely effects on labor, capital, productivity, and output, as well as any feedback from such effects to the federal budget. Policymakers would benefit from knowing the expected sizes of those effects, and advances in research and in the estimating agencies’ tools and experience have made such analysis more feasible. If Congress requested that those effects be included more often in official budget estimates—so-called dynamic scoring of legislation—the advantages and disadvantages would vary across policy areas. For some areas, the estimated budgetary impact of the currently excluded effects would be significantly different from the impact of the included effects. But dynamic scoring would be substantially more time-consuming than conventional scoring, and in some areas, the research base is insufficient for credible estimation.
-
-
Copy CitationDouglas W. Elmendorf, R. Glenn Hubbard, and Heidi L. Williams, "Dynamic Scoring: A Progress Report on Why, When, and How," NBER Working Paper 33425 (2025), https://doi.org/10.3386/w33425.Download Citation
-
Published Versions
Douglas Elmendorf & Glenn Hubbard & Heidi Williams, 2024. "Dynamic Scoring: A Progress Report on Why, When, and How," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, vol 2024(2), pages 93-160. citation courtesy of 
Related
More from the NBER
In addition to working papers, the NBER disseminates affiliates’ latest findings through a range of free periodicals—the NBER Reporter, the NBER Digest, the Bulletin on Health, the Bulletin on the Economics of Alzheimer's, and the Bulletin on Entrepreneurship—as well as research spotlights, lectures, and panel videos.
