When Information Conflicts with Obligations: the Role of Motivated Cognition
We experimentally test how psychological motivations can impact the processing of purely objective information. We first document that, when the high-stakes College Entrance Exam is held in the month of Ramadan, Chinese Muslim students perform significantly worse. When asked about the impact of fasting, they severely underestimate the cost of taking the exam during Ramadan, even when presented with direct empirical evidence. In the experiment, we randomly offer students reading materials in which well-respected Muslim clerics explain that it is permissible to postpone the fast until after the exam. Consistent with an interpretation of motivated cognition, students who receive the material distort the statistics about the fasting cost significantly less, and become more accepting of delaying the fast for the exam.
-
-
Copy CitationAo Wang, Shaoda Wang, and Xiaoyang Ye, "When Information Conflicts with Obligations: the Role of Motivated Cognition," NBER Working Paper 30581 (2022), https://doi.org/10.3386/w30581.Download Citation
-
Published Versions
Ao Wang & Shaoda Wang & Xiaoyang Ye, 2023. "When Information Conflicts with Obligations: the Role of Motivated Cognition," The Economic Journal, vol 133(654), pages 2533-2552.
Related
Programs
Working Groups
More from the NBER
In addition to working papers, the NBER disseminates affiliates’ latest findings through a range of free periodicals — the NBER Reporter, the NBER Digest, the Bulletin on Health, and the Bulletin on Entrepreneurship — as well as online conference reports, video lectures, and interviews.
