NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

On the Divergence in Unionism among Developed Countries

Richard B. Freeman

NBER Working Paper No. 2817 (Also Reprint No. r1627)
Issued in 1989
NBER Program(s):   LS

In this paper I explore the evolution of unionism in the 1970n and 1980s, when the post-oil shock world economy created a "crisis of unionism" throughout the western world. I try to explain why union representation of work forces fell in some countries but not in others and contrast union responses to the challenge of the period. I find that: -- Rates of unionization diverged greatly among developed countries -- The composition of union members shifted from private sector blue collar workers to public sector end white collar workers in all countries, producing increased divisions within union movements by category of worker -- Changes in the industrial composition of employment, changes in public attitudes toward unionism, and the growth of governmental protection of labor do not explain the divergence in density -- Differing rates of inflation contributed to the divergence, with unions doing better in countries with high inflation. In addition, unemployment raised density in settings where unions disperse unemployment benefits -- The primary reason for the divergence are differences in the incentives and opportunities different industrial relations systems give employers to oppose unions. Unions fared best in neo-corporatist settings and worst in settings where decentralized bargaining creates a strong profit incentive for managers to oppose unions and where management is relatively free to act on that incentive -- Union organizations and modes of operating changed significantly in some countries with declining or endangered unionism but not in others Most strikingly, my analysis indicates that if 1980s trends continue the west will be divided between countries with strong trade union movements operating in a neo-corporatist system, as in Scandinavia, and countries with 'ghetto unionism' limited to special segments of the work force, as in the United States.

download in pdf format
   (261 K)

download in djvu format
   (168 K)

email paper

This paper is available as PDF (261 K) or DjVu (168 K) (Download viewer) or via email.

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w2817

Published: "On the Divergence of Unionism among Developed Countries." From Labour Relations and Economic Performance, edited by Renato Brunetta and Carlo Dell' Aringa, pp. 304-322. London: Macmillan Press, 1990.

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Freeman and Pelletier w3167 The Impact of Industrial Relations Legislation on British Union Density
Bryson and Freeman w12310 Worker Needs and Voice in the US and the UK
Freeman and Medoff w0364 The Two Faces of Unionism
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Data
People
About

Support
National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us