Money-Back Guarantees in Individual Retirement Accounts: Are They Good Policy?
Pension products embedding guarantees have been adopted worldwide, including in the Pan-European Personal Pension Products (PEPP) recently launched in the European Union. Using an economic life cycle model where investors have access to stocks, bonds, and tax-qualified retirement accounts, we show that abandoning the guarantee could enhance old-age consumption for over 75% of retirees without harming pre-retirement consumption. Life cycle funds offer an alternative for capital preservation, but they would produce lower average payouts. Investors averse to equity losses accumulate only moderately more in guaranteed accounts, as these offer only limited protection against market crashes.
-
-
Copy CitationVanya Horneff, Daniel Liebler, Raimond Maurer, and Olivia S. Mitchell, "Money-Back Guarantees in Individual Retirement Accounts: Are They Good Policy?," NBER Working Paper 26406 (2019), https://doi.org/10.3386/w26406.Download Citation
-
Published Versions
Horneff, Vanya & Liebler, Daniel & Maurer, Raimond & Mitchell, Olivia S., 2025. "Money-back guarantees in individual retirement accounts: Are they good policy?," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(3), pages 371-391, July. citation courtesy of 
Vanya Horneff & Daniel Liebler & Raimond Maurer & Olivia S. Mitchell, 2025. "Money-back guarantees in individual retirement accounts: Are they good policy?," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, vol 24(3), pages 371-391.
Related
More from the NBER
In addition to working papers, the NBER disseminates affiliates’ latest findings through a range of free periodicals — the NBER Reporter, the NBER Digest, the Bulletin on Health, and the Bulletin on Entrepreneurship — as well as online conference reports, video lectures, and interviews.
