Early Childhood Education
This paper organizes and synthesizes the literature on early childhood education and childcare. In it, we go beyond meta-analysis and reanalyze primary data sources in a common framework. We consider the evidence from means-tested demonstration programs, large-scale means-tested programs and universal programs without means testing. We discuss which programs are beneficial and whether they are cost-effective for certain populations. The evidence from high-quality demonstration programs targeted toward disadvantaged children shows beneficial effects. Returns exceed costs, even accounting for the deadweight loss of collecting taxes. When proper policy counterfactuals are constructed, Head Start has beneficial effects on disadvantaged children compared to home alternatives. Universal programs benefit disadvantaged children.
-
-
Copy CitationSneha Elango, Jorge Luis García, James J. Heckman, and Andrés Hojman, "Early Childhood Education," NBER Working Paper 21766 (2015), https://doi.org/10.3386/w21766.Download Citation
-
-
Published Versions
Early Childhood Education, Sneha Elango, Jorge Luis García, James J. Heckman, Andrés Hojman. in Economics of Means-Tested Transfer Programs in the United States, Volume 2, Moffitt. 2016
More from the NBER
In addition to working papers, the NBER disseminates affiliates’ latest findings through a range of free periodicals — the NBER Reporter, the NBER Digest, the Bulletin on Health, and the Bulletin on Entrepreneurship — as well as online conference reports, video lectures, and interviews.
