NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

On Measuring Time Preferences

James Andreoni, Michael A. Kuhn, Charles Sprenger

NBER Working Paper No. 19392
Issued in August 2013
NBER Program(s):   PE

Eliciting time preferences has become an important component of both laboratory and field experiments, yet there is no consensus as how to best measure discounting. We examine the predictive validity of two recent, simple, easily administered, and individually successful elicitation tools: Convex Time Budgets (CTB) and Double Multiple Price Lists (DMPL). Using similar methods, the CTB and DMPL are compared using within- and out-of-sample predictions. While each perform equally well within sample, the CTB significantly outperforms the DMPL on out-of-sample measures.

download in pdf format
   (348 K)

email paper

Supplementary materials for this paper:

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w19392

Published: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization Volume 116, August 2015, Pages 451–464 Cover image Measuring time preferences: A comparison of experimental methods ☆ James Andreonia, , Michael A. Kuhnb, , Charles Sprengerc, ,

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Augenblick, Niederle, and Sprenger w18734 Working Over Time: Dynamic Inconsistency in Real Effort Tasks
Andreoni and Sprenger w16347 Estimating Time Preferences from Convex Budgets
Ericson and Fuster w19384 The Endowment Effect
Filiz-Ozbay, Guryan, Hyndman, Kearney, and Ozbay w19130 Do Lottery Payments Induce Savings Behavior: Evidence from the Lab
Giné, Goldberg, Silverman, and Yang w18065 Revising Commitments: Field Evidence on the Adjustment of Prior Choices
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Themes
Data
People
About

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us