What Makes Annuitization More Appealing?
NBER Working Paper No. 18575
We conduct and analyze two large surveys of hypothetical annuitization choices. We find that allowing individuals to annuitize a fraction of their wealth increases annuitization relative to a situation where annuitization is an “all or nothing” decision. Very few respondents choose declining real payout streams over flat or increasing real payout streams of equivalent expected present value. Highlighting the effects of inflation increases demand for cost of living adjustments. Frames that highlight flexibility, control, and investment significantly reduce annuitization. A majority of respondents prefer to receive an extra “bonus” payment during one month of the year that is funded by slightly lower payments in the remaining months. Concerns about later-life income, spending flexibility, and counterparty risk are the most important self-reported motives that influence the annuitization decision.
An online appendix is available for this publication.
This paper was revised on June 5, 2013
Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w18575
Forthcoming: What Makes Annuitization More Appealing?, John Beshears, James Choi, David Laibson, Brigitte Madrian, Stephen P. Zeldes. in Retirement Benefits for State and Local Employees: Designing Pension Plans for the Twenty-First Century, Clark and Rauh. 2014
Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these: