What Makes Annuitization More Appealing?
NBER Working Paper No. 18575
Issued in November 2012
NBER Program(s): AG
We conduct and analyze two large surveys of hypothetical annuitization choices. We find that allowing individuals to annuitize a fraction of their wealth increases annuitization relative to a situation where annuitization is an “all or nothing” decision. Very few respondents choose declining real payout streams over flat or increasing real payout streams of equivalent expected present value. Highlighting the effects of inflation increases demand for cost of living adjustments. Frames that highlight flexibility, control, and investment significantly reduce annuitization. A majority of respondents prefer to receive an extra “bonus” payment during one month of the year that is funded by slightly lower payments in the remaining months. Concerns about later-life income, spending flexibility, and counterparty risk are the most important self-reported motives that influence the annuitization decision.
A non-technical summary of this paper is available in the 2013 number 1 issue of the NBER Bulletin on Aging and Health. You can sign up to receive the NBER Bulletin on Aging and Health by email.
This paper is available as PDF (589 K) or via email.
A data appendix is available at http://www.nber.org/data-appendix/w18575
This paper was revised on June 5, 2013
Acknowledgments and Disclosures
Machine-readable bibliographic record -
Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w18575
- What Makes Annuitization More Appealing?, John Beshears, James Choi, David Laibson, Brigitte C. Madrian, Stephen P. Zeldes. in Retirement Benefits for State and Local Employees: Designing Pension Plans for the Twenty-First Century, Clark, Rauh, and Duggan. 2014
- Beshears, John & Choi, James J. & Laibson, David & Madrian, Brigitte C. & Zeldes, Stephen P., 2014. "What makes annuitization more appealing?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 2-16. citation courtesy of
Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
|Chetty, Friedman, Leth-Petersen, Nielsen, and Olsen
||w18565 Active vs. Passive Decisions and Crowdout in Retirement Savings Accounts: Evidence from Denmark
|Cespedes and Velasco
||w18569 Macroeconomic Performance During Commodity Price Booms and Busts
|Beshears, Choi, Laibson, and Madrian
||w19193 Who Uses the Roth 401(k), and How Do They Use It?
|Auerbach and Gorodnichenko
||w18578 Output Spillovers from Fiscal Policy
|Buser, Niederle, and Oosterbeek
||w18576 Gender, Competitiveness and Career Choices