NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

Testing the Random Walk Hypothesis: Power versus Frequency of Observation

Robert J. Shiller, Pierre Perron

NBER Technical Working Paper No. 45
Issued in April 1985
NBER Program(s):   ME

Power functions of tests of the random walk hypothesis versus stationary first order autoregressive alternatives are tabulated for samples of fixed span but various frequencies of observation.

download in pdf format
   (481 K)

email paper

This paper is available as PDF (481 K) or via email.

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/t0045

Published: Perron, Pierre and Robert J. Shiller. "Testing the Random Walk Hypothesis: Power Versus Frequency of Observation," Economic Letters, Vol. 18, 1985,pp. 381-386.

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Lo and MacKinlay w2168 Stock Market Prices Do Not Follow Random Walks: Evidence From a Simple Specification Test
Campbell and Perron t0100 Pitfalls and Opportunities: What Macroeconomists Should Know About Unit Roots
Shiller w0456 Do Stock Prices Move Too Much to be Justified by Subsequent Changes in Dividends?
Campbell and Shiller w1885 Cointegration and Tests of Present Value Models
Lo and MacKinlay t0066 The Size and Power of the Variance Ratio Test in Finite Samples: A Monte Carlo Investigation
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Data
People
About

Support
National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us