The Return to Protectionism
After decades of supporting free trade, in 2018 the U.S. raised import tariffs and major trade partners retaliated. We analyze the short-run impact of this return to protectionism on the U.S. economy. Import and retaliatory tariffs caused large declines in imports and exports. Prices of imports targeted by tariffs did not fall, implying complete pass-through of tariffs to duty-inclusive prices. The resulting losses to U.S. consumers and firms who buy imports was $51 billion, or 0.27% of GDP. We embed the estimated trade elasticities in a general-equilibrium model of the U.S. economy. After accounting for tariff revenue and gains to domestic producers, the aggregate real income loss was $7.2 billion, or 0.04% of GDP. Import tariffs favored sectors concentrated in politically competitive counties, and the model implies that tradeable-sector workers in heavily Republican counties were the most negatively affected due to the retaliatory tariffs.
-
-
Copy CitationPablo D. Fajgelbaum, Pinelopi K. Goldberg, Patrick J. Kennedy, and Amit K. Khandelwal, "The Return to Protectionism," NBER Working Paper 25638 (2019), https://doi.org/10.3386/w25638.Download Citation
-
Non-Technical Summaries
- Author(s): Pablo D. FajgelbaumPinelopi K. GoldbergPatrick J. KennedyAmit KhandelwalMary AmitiStephen J. ReddingDavid WeinsteinRecent tariff increases are unprecedented in the post-World War II era in terms of breadth, magnitude, and the sizes of the countries...
Published Versions
Pablo D Fajgelbaum & Pinelopi K Goldberg & Patrick J Kennedy & Amit K Khandelwal, 2020. "The Return to Protectionism*," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol 135(1), pages 1-55. citation courtesy of 
Related
Topics
Programs
More from the NBER
In addition to working papers, the NBER disseminates affiliates’ latest findings through a range of free periodicals — the NBER Reporter, the NBER Digest, the Bulletin on Health, and the Bulletin on Entrepreneurship — as well as online conference reports, video lectures, and interviews.
