NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

IS-LM and Monetarism

Michael D. Bordo, Anna J. Schwartz

NBER Working Paper No. 9713
Issued in May 2003
NBER Program(s):   DAE   ME

This paper discusses monetarist objections to the IS-LM model. We explore the views of two principal spokesmen for monetarism: Milton Friedman and the team of Karl Brunner and Allan Meltzer. Friedman did not explicitly state the reasons he generally chose not to use the IS-LM model in rejecting Keynesian views on the demand function for money, the role of autonomous expenditures in cyclical fluctuations, the potency of fiscal policy as against monetary policy, etc. He presented statistical findings, historical evidence, and econometric results to support his alternative analysis of macroeconomics, but his critics were unconvinced. In 1970, in an effort to use his critics' common language, he set up a model with explicit terms for IS-LM to encompass both the quantity theory and the income-expenditure theory. Friedman attributed the failure of this effort to the fact that he was a Marshallian, his opponents Walrasians. Brunner and Meltzer's objections to IS-LM were explicit. They found it too spare, so they elaborated it by adding a credit market, disaggregating the asset market by specifying three assets: base money, government debt, and real capital. They set up a model with financial institutions and utilized it to study the effects of a variety of policies. In brief, summarizing the views of both Friedman and Brunner and Meltzer, monetarists dislike the IS-LM framework because it limits monetary influence too narrowly, essentially to the interest elasticity of money demand, and defines investment in an excessively narrow fashion, and even that is not explicit.

download in pdf format
   (186 K)

email paper

This paper is available as PDF (186 K) or via email.

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Published: Bordo, Michael D. and Anna J. Schwartz. "IS-LM And Monetarism," History of Political Economy, 2004, v36(4,Winter), 217-239.

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Bordo and Schwartz w12593 David Laidler on Monetarism
McCallum and Nelson w5875 An Optimizing IS-LM Specification for Monetary Policy and Business Cycle Analysis
Cespedes, Chang, and Velasco w9337 IS-LM-BP in the Pampas
Casares and McCallum w7908 An Optimizing IS-LM Framework with Endogenous Investment
Romer w7461 Keynesian Macroeconomics without the LM Curve
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
Data
People
About

Support
National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us