NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

Bad Beta, Good Beta

John Y. Campbell, Tuomo Vuolteenaho

NBER Working Paper No. 9509
Issued in February 2003
NBER Program(s):   AP

This paper explains the size and value anomalies' in stock returns using an economically motivated two-beta model. We break the CAPM beta of a stock with the market portfolio into two components, one reflecting news about the market's future cash flows and one reflecting news about the market's discount rates. Intertemporal asset pricing theory suggests that the former should have a higher price of risk; thus beta, like cholesterol, comes in bad' and good' varieties. Empirically, we find that value stocks and small stocks have considerably higher cash-flow betas than growth stocks and large stocks, and this can explain their higher average returns. The poor performance of the CAPM since 1963 is explained by the fact that growth stocks and high-past-beta stocks have predominantly good betas with low risk prices.

download in pdf format
   (571 K)

email paper

This paper is available as PDF (571 K) or via email.

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w9509

Published: Campbell, Johny. and Tuomo Vuolteenaho. "Bad Beta, Good Beta," American Economic Review, 2004, v94(5,Dec), 1249-1275. citation courtesy of

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Mankiw and Shapiro w1399 Risk and Return: Consumption versus Market Beta
Campbell and Vuolteenaho w10263 Inflation Illusion and Stock Prices
Campbell w3246 A Variance Decomposition for Stock Returns
Vuolteenaho w8240 What Drives Firm-Level Stock Returns?
Cochrane w11193 Financial Markets and the Real Economy
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Data
People
About

Support
National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us