TY - JOUR AU - Darby,Michael R. AU - Zucker,Lynne G. AU - Wang,Andrew TI - Universities, Joint Ventures, and Success in the Advanced Technology Program JF - National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series VL - No. 9463 PY - 2003 Y2 - January 2003 UR - http://www.nber.org/papers/w9463 L1 - http://www.nber.org/papers/w9463.pdf N1 - Author contact info: Michael R. Darby John E. Anderson Graduate School of Management University of California, Los Angeles 110 Westwood Plaza, Box 951481 Los Angeles, CA 90095-1481 Tel: 310/825-4180 Fax: 310/454-2748 E-Mail: michael.r.darby@anderson.ucla.edu Lynne G. Zucker Departments of Sociology & Public Policy UCLA Box 951551 Los Angeles, CA 90095-1551 Tel: 310/825-9155 Fax: 310/454-2748 E-Mail: zucker@ucla.edu Andrew Wang Harvard University E-Mail: awang@nber.org AB - America's most innovative firms participate in the U.S. Commerce Department's Advanced Technology Program (ATP) those that participated at least once accounted for over 40 percent of U.S. patents to U.S. entities during 1988-1996. Many firms are repeat participants. ATP participation has significant and robust effects on innovation in firms, generally increasing firms' patenting during the time they are receiving ATP support, when compared to patenting by the same firms prior to and after the ATP award. ATP participation increases firms' patenting on average by between 5 and 30 patents per year during the period of ATP participation. This represents a 4 to 25 percent increase in firms' patenting compared to the period before ATP participation. Furthermore, joint-venture (JV) project participation and university participation in a project both appear to have a positive impact on firm patenting. The amount of funding received by the firm is crucial for single participants, with the positive impact concentrated in those firms with large grants. Single participants are more likely than JV members to be small startups for which ATP funding is large relative to the total R&D budget. For JV participants, participation is more important than the level of funding. ER -