TY  - JOUR
AU  - Krueger,Dirk
AU  - Kumar,Krishna B.
TI  - Skill-specific rather then General Education: A Reason for US-Europe Growth Differences?
JF  - National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series
VL  - No. 9408
PY  - 2003
Y2  - January 2003
UR  - http://www.nber.org/papers/w9408
L1  - http://www.nber.org/papers/w9408.pdf
N1  - Author contact info:
Dirk Krueger
Department of Economics
University of Pennsylvania
3718 Locust Walk
Philadelphia, PA 19104
Tel: 215/898-6691
Fax: 215/573-2057
E-Mail: dkrueger@econ.upenn.edu

Krishna Kumar
RAND Corporation
1776 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA  90407
E-Mail: kumar@rand.org
AB  - In this paper, we develop a model of technology adoption and economic growth in which households optimally obtain either a concept-based,  general' education or a skill-specific, vocational' education. General education is more costly to obtain, but enables workers to operate new technologies incorporated into production. Firms weigh the cost of adopting and operating new technologies against increased revenues and optimally choose the level of adoption. We show that an economy whose policies favor vocational education will grow slower in equilibrium than one that favors general education. Moreover, the gap between their growth rates will increase with the growth rate of available technology. By characterizing the optimal Ramsey education subsidy policy we demonstrate that the optimal subsidy for general education increases with the growth rate of available technology. Our theory suggests that European education policies that favored specialized, vocational education might have worked well, both in terms of growth rates and welfare, during the 60s and 70s when available technologies changed slowly. In the information age of the 80s and 90s when new technologies emerged at a more rapid pace, however, it may have suboptimally contributed to slow growth and may have increased the growth gap relative to the US.
ER  -