TY  - JOUR
AU  - Chacko,George
AU  - Tufano,Peter
AU  - Verter,Geoffrey
TI  - Cephalon, Inc. Taking Risk Management Theory Seriously
JF  - National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series
VL  - No. 7748
PY  - 2000
Y2  - June 2000
UR  - http://www.nber.org/papers/w7748
L1  - http://www.nber.org/papers/w7748.pdf
N1  - Author contact info:
George Chacko
National Institutes on Health
E-Mail: chackoge@csr.nih.gov

Peter Tufano
Peter Moores Dean
University of Oxford
Saïd Business School
Park End Street
Oxford OX1 1HP UK
Tel: +1 44(0) 1865 288 812
E-Mail: peter.tufano@sbs.ox.ac.uk
AB  - We study a firm that justifies its novel use of equity derivatives as a cash-flow hedging strategy.  Our purpose is to understand the challenge of translating risk management theory into managerial action.  Cephalon Inc., a biotech firm, bought a large block of call options on its own stock.  If the FDA approved the firm's new drug, the firm would have large cash needs, which the options were designed to meet. We analyze this stated rationale for the firm's choice, applying the cash flow hedging concepts articulated by Froot, Scharfstein and Stein (1993).  In applying the theory to practice, there are lessons for both managers and theorists.  Managers consider deadweight costs of financing and of risk management, whereas theory tends to ignore the latter costs.  While theory is driven by costs of external financing, managers must measure these costs to arrive at decisions and this measurement problem is severe.  Cephalon's risk management decisions seem motivated as much by fluctuations in the availability and cost of external financing and by accounting considerations as by fluctuations in operating cash flows or desired investment. Finally, even a field-based examination of this strategy cannot reject the conclusion that the transaction was motivated by goals other than risk management.
ER  -