NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities are not Valid Measures of Financing Constraints

Steven N. Kaplan, Luigi Zingales

NBER Working Paper No. 7659
Issued in April 2000
NBER Program(s):   CF

Kaplan and Zingales [1997] provide both theoretical arguments and empirical evidence that investment-cash flow sensitivities are not good indicators of financing constraints. Fazzari, Hubbard and Petersen [1999] criticize those findings. In this note, we explain how the Fazzari et al. [1999] criticisms are either very supportive of the claims in Kaplan and Zingales [1997] or incorrect. We conclude with a discussion of unanswered questions.

download in pdf format
   (22 K)

email paper

This paper is available as PDF (22 K) or via email.

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w7659

Published: Published as "Do Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities Provide Useful Measuresof Financing Constraints?", Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 107, no. 1(February 1997): 16-215. citation courtesy of

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Kaplan and Zingales w5267 Do Financing Constraints Explain Why Investment is Correlated with Cash Flow?
Fazzari, Hubbard, and Petersen w5462 Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment: Response to Kaplan and Zingales
Fazzari, Hubbard, and Petersen w2387 Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment
Lamont, Polk, and Saa-Requejo w6210 Financial Constraints and Stock Returns
Hovakimian and Titman w9432 Corporate Investment with Financial Constraints: Sensitivity of Investment to Funds from Voluntary Asset Sales
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Data
People
About

Support
National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us