NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

Neutralizing the Adverse Industry Impacts of CO2 Abatement Policies: What Does it Cost?

A. Lans Bovenberg, Lawrence H. Goulder

NBER Working Paper No. 7654
Issued in April 2000
NBER Program(s):   PE   EEE

The most cost-effective policies for achieving CO2 abatement (e.g., carbon taxes) fail to get off the ground politically because of unacceptable distributional consequences. This paper explores CO2 abatement policies designed to address distributional concerns. Using an intertemporal numerical general equilibrium model of the U.S., we examine how efficiency costs change when these policies include features that neutralize adverse impacts on energy industries. We find that avoiding adverse impacts on profits and equity values in fossil fuel industries involves a relatively small efficiency cost. This stems from the fact that CO2 abatement policies have the potential to generate revenues that are very large relative to the potential loss of profit. By enabling firms to retain only a very small fraction of these potential revenues, the government can protect firms' profits and equity values. Thus, the government needs to grandfather only a small percentage of CO2 emissions permits or, similarly, must exempt only a small fraction of emissions from the base of a carbon tax. These policies involve a small sacrifice of potential government revenue. Such revenue has an efficiency value because it can finance cuts in pre-existing distortionary taxes. Because the revenue sacrifice is small, the efficiency cost is small as well. We also find that there is a very large difference between preserving firms' profits and preserving their tax payments. Offsetting producers' carbon tax payments on a dollar-for-dollar basis (through cuts in corporate tax rates, for example) substantially overcompensates firms, raising profits and equity values significantly relative to the unregulated situation. This reflects the fact that producers can shift onto consumers most of the burden from a carbon tax. The efficiency costs of such policies are far greater than the costs of policies that do not overcompensate firms.

download in pdf format
   (396 K)

email paper

This paper is available as PDF (396 K) or via email.

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w7654

Published:

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Carraro and Metcalf w7648 Behavioral and Distributional Effects of Environmental Policy Introduction
Bovenberg and Goulder Neutralizing the Adverse Industry Impacts of CO2 Abatement Policies: What Does It Cost?
Bovenberg and Goulder w5117 Costs of Environmentally Motivated Taxes in the Presence of Other Taxes:General Equilibrium Analyses
Bushnell and Chen w15495 Regulation, Allocation, and Leakage in Cap-and-Trade Markets for CO2
Hassett, Mathur, and Metcalf w13554 The Incidence of a U.S. Carbon Tax: A Lifetime and Regional Analysis
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Data
People
About

Support
National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us