NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

Ohlin Versus Stolper-Samuelson?

Douglas A. Irwin

NBER Working Paper No. 7641
Issued in April 2000
NBER Program(s):   DAE   ITI

This paper examines Bertil Ohlin's analysis of trade policy and factor rewards in the context of the late nineteenth and early twentieth century United States. A leading question of the day was whether labor could benefit from protection. Ohlin suspected that labor could benefit from protection and his writings helped spawn the Stolper-Samuelson theorem, which was different from but consistent with Ohlin's approach. This paper seeks to find evidence on whether U.S. tariffs on imported labor-intensive manufactures helped enhance the income of labor at the expense of capital and land. The answer is unclear: vastly different conclusions arise from a calibrated general equilibrium Ohlin-style model and a factor content of trade calculation indirect evidence from lobbying and voting patterns over the tariff are also ambiguous.

download in pdf format
   (71 K)

email paper

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w7641

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Leamer w5427 In Search of Stolper-Samuelson Effects on U.S. Wages
Baldwin w3110 The Stolper-Samuelson Theorem Reconsidered: An Example of Ricardian Dynamic Trade Effects
Davis and Mishra Stolper-Samuelson Is Dead: And Other Crimes of Both Theory and Data
Williamson w9656 Was It Stolper-Samuelson, Infant Industry or Something Else? World Trade Tariffs 1789-1938
O'Rourke w9872 Heckscher-Ohlin Theory and Individual Attitudes Towards Globalization
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Themes
Data
People
About

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us