NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

Potential Pitfalls for the Purchasing-Power-Parity Puzzle? Sampling and Specification Biases in Mean-Reversion Tests of the Law of One Price

Alan M. Taylor

NBER Working Paper No. 7577
Issued in March 2000
NBER Program(s):   DAE   IFM   ITI

The PPP puzzle is based on empirical evidence that international price differences for individual goods (LOOP) or baskets of goods (PPP) appear highly persistent or even non-stationary. The present consensus is these price differences have a half-life that is of the order of five years at best, and infinity at worst. This seems unreasonable in a world where transportation and transaction costs appear so low as to encourage arbitrage and the convergence of price gaps over much shorter horizons, typically days or weeks. However, current empirics rely on a particular choice of methodology, involving (i) relatively low-frequency monthly, quarterly, or annual data, and (ii) a linear model specification. In fact, these methodological choices are not innocent, and they can be shown to bias analysis to-wards findings of slow convergence and a random walk. Intuitively, if we suspect that the actual adjustment horizon is of the order of days then monthly and annual data cannot be expected to reveal it. If we suspect arbitrage costs are high enough to produce a substantial band of inaction' then a linear model will fail to support convergence if the process spends considerable time random-walking in that band. Thus, when testing for PPP or LOOP, model specification and data sampling should not proceed without consideration of the actual institutional context and logistical framework of markets.

download in pdf format
   (222 K)

email paper

This paper is available as PDF (222 K) or via email.

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w7577

Published: Taylor, Alan M. "Potential Pitfalls For The Purchasing-Power-Parity Puzzle? Sampling And Specification Biases In Mean-Reversion Tests Of The Law Of None Price," Econometrica, 2001, v69(2,Mar), 473-498. citation courtesy of

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Taylor w8012 A Century of Purchasing-Power Parity
Taylor w5742 International Capital Mobility in History: Purchasing-Power Parity in the Long Run
Imbs, Mumtaz, Ravn, and Rey w9372 PPP Strikes Back: Aggregation and the Real Exchange Rate
Taylor and Taylor w10607 The Purchasing Power Parity Debate
Frankel and Rose w5006 A Panel Project on Purchasing Power Parity: Mean Reversion Within and Between Countries
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Data
People
About

Support
National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us