Are All Banking Crises Alike? The Japanese Experience in International Comparison
NBER Working Paper No. 7253
This paper examines episodes of banking sector distress for a large sample of developed and developing countries, highlighting the experience of Japan. By a host of criteria, Japan appeared to be in a stronger position than most countries at the onset of banking problems low inflation, appreciating currency, balanced government budget, and large external surpluses. However, Japan followed a clear international boom-and-bust pattern in terms of real output growth, credit growth and stock price movements. We estimate a multivariate probit model that links the likelihood of banking problems to a set of macroeconomic variables and institutional characteristics. The model predicts a high probability of banking sector distress in Japan in the early 1990s. In particular, the likelihood of an episode of banking distress rose in line with the sharp drop in asset prices, deepening recession and 'moral hazard' problem (financial liberalization combined with explicit deposit insurance). The Japanese case is also noteworthy by the long duration of the banking crisis, the length of the coincident recession and general malaise over the economy, the slow regulatory response, and the long delay in the commitment of public funds to re-capitalize the banking sector.
Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w7253
Published: Hutchison, Michael and Kathleen McDill. "Are All Banking Crises Alike? The Japanese Experience In International Comparison," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 1999, v13(3,Sep), 155-180. citation courtesy of
Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these: