NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

The Usual Excess-Burden Approximation Usually Doesn't Come Close

Lawrence H. Goulder, Roberton C. Williams III

NBER Working Paper No. 7034
Issued in March 1999
NBER Program(s):   PE

This paper shows that the usual excess-burden triangle' formula performs poorly when used to assess the excess burden from taxes on intermediate inputs or consumer goods, and derives a practical alternative to this formula. We use an analytically tractable general equilibrium model to reveal how interactions with pre-existing taxes in other markets critically affect the excess burden of new taxes on intermediate inputs or consumer goods. The usual excess-burden formula ignores these interactions, and consequently yields highly inaccurate assessments of excess burden. Prior economic theory implicitly acknowledges the relevance of general-equilibrium interactions to excess burden, but does not indicate which interactions are most important or reveal the fundamental (first-order) contribution of these interactions. Moreover, prior studies do not offer a practical alternative to the usual excess-burden approximation. This paper helps fill the gap between theory and practice. First, it shows analytically that the importance of the interaction with a given pre-existing tax is roughly proportional to the amount of revenue raised by that tax. Second, the paper derives a practical alternative formula for approximating the excess burden from a commodity tax. Finally, it performs numerical simulations to illustrate the significance of adopting our alternative to the usual approximation formula. For realistic parameter values and a wide range of assumed rates for prior taxes, the usual formula captures less than half of the excess burden of taxes on commodities. When the rate of the new tax is small,' this formula captures less than five percent of the true excess burden. In contrast, the alternative approximation formula derived here yields estimates that are consistently within five percent of the actual excess burden.

download in pdf format
   (342 K)

email paper

This paper is available as PDF (342 K) or via email.

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w7034

Published: Goulder, Lawrence and Roberton C. Williams III. "The Substantial Bias from Ignoring General Equilibrium Effects in Estimating Excess Burden, and a Practical Solution." Journal of Political Economy 111 (2003): 898-927.

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Auerbach w1025 The Theory of Excess Burden and Optimal Taxation
Fullerton and Kodrzycki w2353 The Marginal Excess Burden of Different Capital Tax Instruments
Williams w8049 Environmental Tax Interactions When Pollution Affects Health or Productivity
Auerbach and Hines w8181 Taxation and Economic Efficiency
Chetty w14399 Sufficient Statistics for Welfare Analysis: A Bridge Between Structural and Reduced-Form Methods
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Data
People
About

Support
National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us