NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

All School Finance Equalizations Are Not Created Equal

Caroline M. Hoxby

NBER Working Paper No. 6792
Issued in November 1998
NBER Program(s):   PE

Public school finance equalization programs can be characterized by the change they impose on the tax price of an additional dollar of local school spending. I calculate the tax price of spending for each school district in the United States for 1972, 1982, and 1992. I find that using the actual tax prices (rather than treating school finance equalizations as events) resolves apparently conflicting evidence about the effects of equalizations on per-pupil spending. Depending on whether they impose tax prices greater than or less than one, school finance equalizations either enjoy increased spending under most equalization schemes, but they actually lose spending under the strongest schemes such as those that exist in California and New Mexico. More importantly, regardless of whether an equalization levels down or up, it should be understood as a tax system on districts' spending. I show that school finance equalization schemes have properties that are generally considered undesirable: they raise revenue on a base that is itself a function of the school finance system and they assign tax prices so that people with a high demand for education are penalized relative to otherwise identical people with the same income. I discuss some simple, familiar schemes that do not have these undesirable properties, yet can achieve similar redistribution.

download in pdf format
   (1668 K)

email paper

A non-technical summary of this paper is available in the March 1999 NBER digest.  You can sign up to receive the NBER Digest by email.

This paper is available as PDF (1668 K) or via email.

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w6792

Published:

  • as "How Much Does School Spending Depend On Family Income? The Historical Origins Of The Current School Finance Dilemma," American Economic Review, Vol. 88, no. 2 (May 1998): 309-314 ,
  • The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 116, no. 4, (November 2001): 1189-1231

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Hoxby and Kuziemko w10722 Robin Hood and His Not-So-Merry Plan: Capitalization and the Self-Destruction of Texas' School Finance Equalization Plan
Bettinger, Long, Oreopoulos, and Sanbonmatsu w15361 The Role of Simplification and Information in College Decisions: Results from the H&R Block FAFSA Experiment
Card and Payne w6766 School Finance Reform, the Distribution of School Spending, and the Distribution of SAT Scores
Hoxby w5265 Is There an Equity-Efficiency Trade-Off in School Finance? Tiebout and a Theory of the Local Public Goods Producer
Lindert w15491 Revealing Failures in the History of School Finance
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
Data
People
About

Support
National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us