NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

Reconciling Asymmetric Information and Divergent Expectations Theories of Litigation

Joel Waldfogel

NBER Working Paper No. 6409
Issued in February 1998
NBER Program(s):   LE

Both asymmetric information (AI) and divergent expectations (DE) theories offer possible explanations of the litigation puzzle. Under DE, cases proceed to trial when, by chance, the plaintiff is more optimistic than the defendant. As the fraction of cases tried (T) declines, this leads to a tendency toward 50 percent plaintiff win rates at trial (P), regardless of the fraction of plaintiff winners in the filed population. Under AI, by contrast, informed parties proceed to trial only when they expect to win. Hence, as the fraction of cases tried declines, plaintiff win rates at trial tend toward either 0 or 1. We present evidence that the relationship between T and P generated by the litigation process is consistent with DE and not AI. We also offer evidence of the presence of AI early in litigation in the form of one-sided plaintiff win rates in cases adjudicated prior to trial. We reconcile these two findings with evidence that pretrial adjudication and settlement culls both likely plaintiff winners and likely plaintiff losers from the filed pool, causing a tendency toward central rather than extreme plaintiff win rates at trial.

download in pdf format
   (1182 K)

email paper

This paper is available as PDF (1182 K) or via email.

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w6409

Published: Journal of Law & Economics, Vol. 41, no. 2, part 1 (October 1998): 451-476. citation courtesy of

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Waldfogel w4508 The Selection Hypothesis and the Relationship between Trial and Plaintiff Victory
Shavell w9697 Economic Analysis of Litigation and the Legal Process
Eisenberg and Farber w5649 The Litigious Plaintiff Hypothesis: Case Selection and Resolution
Hua and Spier w10943 Information and Externalities in Sequential Litigation
Shavell w0741 The Social versus the Private Incentive to Bring Suit in a Costly Legal System
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Data
People
About

Support
National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us