NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

Public Radio in the United States: Does It Correct Market Failure or Cannibalize Commercial Stations?

Steven T. Berry, Joel Waldfogel

NBER Working Paper No. 6057
Issued in June 1997
NBER Program(s):   IO   LE   PE

Radio signals are pure public goods whose total value to society is the sum of their value to advertisers and listeners. Because broadcasters can capture only part of the value of their product as revenue, there is the potential for a classic problem of underprovision. Small markets have much less commercial program variety than larger markets, suggesting a possible underprovision problem. Public funding of radio broadcasting targets programming in three formats - news, classical music, and jazz - with at least some commercial competition. Whether public support corrects a market failure depends on whether the market would have provided similar services in the absence of public broadcasting. To examine this we ask whether public and commercial classical stations compete for listening share and revenue. We then directly examine whether public stations crowd out commercial stations. We find evidence consistent with the view that public broadcasting crowds out commercial programming in large markets, particularly in classical music and to a lesser extent in jazz. Although the majority of government subsidies to radio broadcasting are allocated to stations without commercial competition in their format (thereby possibly correcting inefficient market underprovision), roughly a quarter of subsidies support direct competition with existing commercial stations.

download in pdf format
   (416 K)

email paper

A non-technical summary of this paper is available in the January 1998 NBER digest.  You can sign up to receive the NBER Digest by email.

This paper is available as PDF (416 K) or via email.

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w6057

Published: Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 71, no. 2 (February 1999): 189-211. citation courtesy of

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Mullainathan and Shleifer w9295 Media Bias
George and Waldfogel w7944 Who Benefits Whom in Daily Newspaper Markets?
Genesove w7076 The Adoption of Offset Presses in the Daily Newspaper Industry in the United States
DellaVigna and Kaplan w12169 The Fox News Effect: Media Bias and Voting
Gentzkow, Glaeser, and Goldin w10791 The Rise of the Fourth Estate: How Newspapers Became Informative and Why It Mattered
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Data
People
About

Support
National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us