NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

Does Economic Geography Matter for International Specialization?

Donald R. Davis, David E. Weinstein

NBER Working Paper No. 5706
Issued in August 1996
NBER Program(s):   ITI

There are two principal theories of why countries trade: comparative advantage and increasing returns to scale. Yet there is no empirical work that assesses the relative importance of these two theories in accounting for production structure and trade. We use a framework that nests an increasing returns model of economic geography featuring home market effects with that of Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek. We employ these trade models to account for the structure of OECD manufacturing production. The data militate against the economic geography framework. Moreover, even in the specification most generous to economic geography, endowments account for 90 percent of the explainable variance, economic geography but 10 percent.

download in pdf format
   (2264 K)

email paper

This paper is available as PDF (2264 K) or via email.

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w5706

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Costinot, Donaldson, and Komunjer w16262 What Goods Do Countries Trade? A Quantitative Exploration of Ricardo's Ideas
Davis and Weinstein w6787 Market Access, Economic Geography, and Comparative Advantage: An Empirical Assessment
Harrigan w5722 Technology, Factor Supplies and International Specialization: Estimating the Neoclassical Model
Arkolakis, Costinot, and Rodriguez-Clare w15628 New Trade Models, Same Old Gains?
Hanson and Xiang w9076 The Home Market Effect and Bilateral Trade Patterns
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Data
People
About

Support
National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us