Social Networks, Learning, and Flexibility: Sourcing Scientific Knowledge in New Biotechnology Firms
NBER Working Paper No. 5320
Issued in October 1995
NBER Program(s): PR
We examine how two highly successful new biotechnology firms (NBFs) source their most critical input -- scientific knowledge. We find that scientists at the two NBFs enter into large numbers of collaborative research efforts with scientists at other organizations, especially universities. Formal market contracts are rarely used to govern these exchanges of scientific knowledge. Our findings suggest that the use of boundary-spanning social networks by the two NBFs increases both their learning and their flexibility in ways that would not be possible within a self-contained hierarchical organization.
Machine-readable bibliographic record -
Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w5320
- Starbuck, William H. and Suzanne G. Tilleman. (eds.) Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management. Volume 3. Learning by Populations of Organizations, Elgar Reference Collection. International Library of Critical Writings on Business and Management, vol. 9. Cheltenham, U.K. and Northampton, Mass.: Elgar, 2008.
- Julia Porter Liebeskind & Amalya Lumerman Oliver & Lynne Zucker & Marilynn Brewer, 1996. "Social networks, Learning, and Flexibility: Sourcing Scientific Knowledge in New Biotechnology Firms," Organization Science, vol 7(4), pages 428-443.
Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
|Acemoglu, Dahleh, Lobel, and Ozdaglar
||w14040 Bayesian Learning in Social Networks
|Zucker, Darby, and Armstrong
||w8499 Commercializing Knowledge: University Science, Knowledge Capture, and Firm Performance in Biotechnology
|Zucker, Darby, and Brewer
||w4653 Intellectual Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises
|Darby and Zucker
||w8947 Growing by Leaps and Inches: Creative Destruction, Real Cost Reduction, and Inching Up
||w10640 Scientific Teams and Institution Collaborations: Evidence from U.S. Universities, 1981-1999