The Inconsistency of Common Scale Estimators When Output Prices Are Unobserved and Engogenous

Tor Jakob Klette, Zvi Griliches

NBER Working Paper No. 4026 (Also Reprint No. r2099)
Issued in March 1992
NBER Program(s):   PR

This paper explores the inconsistency of common scale estimators when output is proxied by deflated sales, based on a common output deflator across firms. The problems arise when firms operate in an imperfectly competitive environment and prices differ between firms. In particular, we show that the scale estimates will tend to be downward biased in the production function case, under a wide range of assumptions about the pattern of technology, demand and factor price shocks. The result also holds for scale estimates obtained from cost functions. The empirical part of the paper presents various estimates of scale economies for a sample of Norwegian manufacturing plants. The findings provide some support for the hypothesis that the firms face an imperfectly competitive environment. The estimates suggests that there are significant markups and scale economies to the variable factors of production in our sample. However, the estimates of markups and scale economies presented in this paper are substantially lower than the results obtained by Hall (1988, 1990) and others using industry level data.

download in pdf format
   (403 K)

download in djvu format
   (265 K)

email paper

This paper is available as PDF (403 K) or DjVu (265 K) (Download viewer) or via email.

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w4026

Published: Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol. 11, pp. 343-361, 1996. citation courtesy of

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Griliches and Mairesse w5067 Production Functions: The Search for Identification
Griliches R&D and Productivity: The Unfinished Business
De Loecker w13155 Product Differentiation, Multi-product Firms and Estimating the Impact of Trade Liberalization on Productivity
Foster, Haltiwanger, and Krizan Aggregate Productivity Growth. Lessons from Microeconomic Evidence
Katayama, Lu, and Tybout w9617 Why Plant-Level Productivity Studies are Often Misleading, and an Alternative Approach to Interference
NBER Videos

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email:

Contact Us