NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

The Cowles Commission Approach, Real Business Cycle Theories, and New Keynesian Economics

Ray C. Fair

NBER Working Paper No. 3990
Issued in February 1992
NBER Program(s):   EFG

The Cowles Commission approach is reviewed and compared to the approaches of real business cycle (RBC) theorists and new Keynesian economists. It is argued that RBC models are not tested in a serious enough way and that the new Keynesian literature is not empirical enough for testing even to be a serious possibility. Macroeconomics seems to be moving away from its traditional empirical basis, which is sad. This paper argues for returning to the path that was abandoned by most macroeconomists around 1970, namely the specification and testing of structural macroeconometric models.

download in pdf format
   (813 K)

email paper

This paper is available as PDF (813 K) or via email.

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w3990

Published: The Business Cycles: Theories and Evidence, (Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Economic Policy Conference of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis), edited by Michael T. Belognia and Michelle R. Garfinkel, pp. 133-147, Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992 citation courtesy of

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Benigno w14824 New-Keynesian Economics: An AS-AD View
Mankiw w2882 Real Business Cycles: A New Keynesian Perspective
King and Rebelo w7534 Resuscitating Real Business Cycles
Rebelo w11401 Real Business Cycle Models: Past, Present, and Future
Zarnowitz w3863 What is a Business Cycle?
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Data
People
About

Support
National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us