NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

Are Economists' Traditional Trade Policy Views Still Valid?

Robert E. Baldwin

NBER Working Paper No. 3793
Issued in July 1991
NBER Program(s):   ITI   IFM

Recent analysis of trade policies under imperfectly competitive market conditions as well as in situations where trade in high-technology products is important have raised doubts whether economists should continue their traditional opposition to trade taxes and subsidies. This paper evaluates the new theoretical arguments for interventionist trade policies by comparing them with the traditional arguments for and against free trade, investigating the empirical evidence supporting the conditions assumed in the new models, appraising the realism of the behavior assumptions of these models and the sensitivity of their conclusions to changes in these assumptions, and considering the political economy implications of these conclusions. The general conclusion is that there are serious practical difficulties with the interventionist arguments of the 'new' trade theorists, as they themselves recognize, just as there are with such traditional arguments for trade intervention as the terms-of-trade case for protection. However, the new industrial organization approach to trade theory has already provided valuable insights into trade behavior in international markets and promises to provide many more as more realistic behavior models are developed.

download in pdf format
   (388 K)

download in djvu format
   (314 K)

email paper

This paper is available as PDF (388 K) or DjVu (314 K) (Download viewer) or via email.

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w3793

Published: Journal of Economic Literature (June 1992): 804-829. citation courtesy of

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Krugman Introduction to "Empirical Studies of Strategic Trade Policy"
Rodriguez and Rodrik Trade Policy and Economic Growth: A Skeptic's Guide to the Cross-National Evidence
Rodrik Imperfect Competition, Scale Economies, and Trade Policy in Developing Countries
Ito, Isard, and Symansky Economic Growth and Real Exchange Rate: An Overview of the Balassa-Samuelson Hypothesis in Asia
Baldwin Openness and Growth: What’s the Empirical Relationship?
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Data
People
About

Support
National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us