NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

The Incidence and Efficiency Costs of Corporate Taxation when Corporate and Noncorporate Firms Produce the Same Good

Jane G. Gravelle, Laurence J. Kotlikoff

NBER Working Paper No. 2462 (Also Reprint No. r1270)
Issued in December 1987
NBER Program(s):   PE

This year marks the twenty-fifth anniversary of Arnold Harberger's celebrated model of the corporation income tax. While the model has been enormously useful as an analytical device for studying two sector economies, its usefulness for understanding the incidence and excess burden of the corporate income tax remains in question. One difficulty confronting all empirical analyses of the Harberger Model is how to treat noncorporate production in primarily corporate sectors and corporate production in primarily noncorporate sectors. The Harberger Model provides no real guide to this question since it assumes that one good is produced only by corporations and the other good is produced only by noncorporate firms. Stated differently, Harberger models the differential taxation of capital used in the production of different goods, rather than the taxation of capital used by corporations per se. This paper presents a two good model with corporate and noncorporate production of both goods. The incidence of the corporate tax in our Mutual Production Model (MPM) can differ markedly from that in the Harberger model. A hallmark of Harberger's corporate tax incidence formula is its dependence on differences across sectors in elasticities of substitution between capital and labor. In contrast, the incidence of the corporate tax in the MPM may fall 100 percent on capital regardless of sector differences in substitution elasticities. The difference between the two models in the deadweight loss from corporate taxation is also striking. Using the Harberger - Shoven data and assuming unitary substitution and demand elasticities, the deadweight loss is over ten times larger in the CES version of the MPM than in the Harberger Model. Part of the explanation for this difference is that in the Harberger Model only the difference in the average corporate tax in the two sectors is distortionary, while the entire tax is distortionary in the MPM. A second reason for the larger excess burden in the MPM is that the MPM has a very large, indeed infinite, substitution elasticity in demand between corporate and noncorporate goods; in contrast, applications of the Harberger Model assume this elasticity is quite small.

download in pdf format
   (418 K)

download in djvu format
   (306 K)

email paper

This paper is available as PDF (418 K) or DjVu (306 K) (Download viewer) or via email.

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w2462

Published: Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 97, No. 4, pp. 749-780, (August 1989). citation courtesy of

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Gravelle and Kotlikoff w2742 Does the Harberger Model Greatly Understate the Excess Burden of the Corporate Tax? - Another Model Says Yes
Auerbach w11686 Who Bears the Corporate Tax? A review of What We Know
Djankov, Ganser, McLiesh, Ramalho, and Shleifer w13756 The Effect of Corporate Taxes on Investment and Entrepreneurship
Gordon and MacKie-Mason Why Is There Corporate Taxation in a Small Open Economy? The Role of Transfer Pricing and Income Shifting
Ballard, Fullerton, Shoven, and Whalley General Equilibrium Analysis of Tax Policies
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Data
People
About

Support
National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us