Risk Aversion as a Perceptual Bias

Mel Win Khaw, Ziang Li, Michael Woodford

NBER Working Paper No. 23294
Issued in March 2017
NBER Program(s):Economic Fluctuations and Growth, Monetary Economics

The theory of expected utility maximization (EUM) explains risk aversion as due to diminishing marginal utility of wealth. However, observed choices between risky lotteries are difficult to reconcile with EUM: for example, in the laboratory, subjects' responses on individual trials involve a random element, and cannot be predicted purely from the terms offered; and subjects often appear to be too risk averse with regard to small gambles (while still accepting sufficiently favorable large gambles) to be consistent with any utility-of-wealth function. We propose a unified explanation for both anomalies, similar to the explanation given for related phenomena in the case of perceptual judgments: they result from judgments based on imprecise (and noisy) mental representation of the decision situation. In this model, risk aversion is predicted without any need for a nonlinear utility-of-wealth function, and instead results from a sort of perceptual bias — but one that represents an optimal Bayesian decision, given the limitations of the mental representation of the situation. We propose a specific quantitative model of the mental representation of a simple lottery choice problem, based on other evidence regarding numerical cognition, and test its ability to explain the choice frequencies that we observe in a laboratory experiment.

You may purchase this paper on-line in .pdf format from ($5) for electronic delivery.

Access to NBER Papers

You are eligible for a free download if you are a subscriber, a corporate associate of the NBER, a journalist, an employee of the U.S. federal government with a ".GOV" domain name, or a resident of nearly any developing country or transition economy.

If you usually get free papers at work/university but do not at home, you can either connect to your work VPN or proxy (if any) or elect to have a link to the paper emailed to your work email address below. The email address must be connected to a subscribing college, university, or other subscribing institution. Gmail and other free email addresses will not have access.


Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w23294

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
Coibion, Gorodnichenko, and Kamdar w23304 The Formation of Expectations, Inflation and the Phillips Curve
Khaw, Stevens, and Woodford w22978 Discrete Adjustment to a Changing Environment: Experimental Evidence
Gabaix and Laibson w23254 Myopia and Discounting
Hébert and Woodford w23787 Rational Inattention and Sequential Information Sampling
Stango, Yoong, and Zinman w23057 The Quest for Parsimony in Behavioral Economics: New Methods and Evidence on Three Fronts
NBER Videos

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email:

Contact Us