NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

Marketplace Plan Payment Options for Dealing with High-Cost Enrollees

Timothy J. Layton, Thomas G. McGuire

NBER Working Paper No. 22519
Issued in August 2016
NBER Program(s):HC, HE

Two of the three elements of the ACA’s “premium stabilization program,” reinsurance and risk corridors, are set to expire in 2017, leaving risk adjustment alone to protect plans against risk of high-cost cases. This paper considers potential modifications of the HHS risk adjustment methodology to maintain plan protection against risk from high-cost cases within the current regulatory framework. We show analytically that modifications of the transfer formula and of the risk adjustment model itself are mathematically equivalent to a conventional actuarially fair reinsurance policy. Furthermore, closely related modifications of the transfer formula or the risk adjustment model can improve on conventional reinsurance by figuring transfers or estimating risk adjustment model weights recognizing the presence of a reinsurance function. In the empirical section, we estimate risk adjustment models with an updated and selected version of the data used to calibrate the federal payment models, and show, using simulation methods, that proposed modifications improve fit at the person level and protect small insurers against high-cost risk better than conventional reinsurance. We simulate various “attachment points” for the reinsurance equivalent policies and quantify the tradeoffs of higher and lower attachment points.

download in pdf format
   (395 K)

email paper

The NBER Bulletin on Aging and Health provides summaries of publications like this.  You can sign up to receive the NBER Bulletin on Aging and Health by email.

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w22519

Published: Timothy J. Layton & Thomas G. McGuire, 2017. "Marketplace Plan Payment Options for Dealing with High-Cost Enrollees," American Journal of Health Economics, vol 3(2), pages 165-191.

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
Banks, Blundell, Levell, and Smith w22513 Life-Cycle Consumption Patterns at Older Ages in the US and the UK: Can Medical Expenditures Explain the Difference?
Layton, Ellis, and McGuire w21531 Assessing Incentives for Adverse Selection in Health Plan Payment Systems
Landersø and Heckman w22465 The Scandinavian Fantasy: The Sources of Intergenerational Mobility in Denmark and the U.S.
Layton, McGuire, and van Kleef w22642 Deriving Risk Adjustment Payment Weights to Maximize Efficiency of Health Insurance Markets
Costinot, Donaldson, Kyle, and Williams w22538 The More We Die, The More We Sell? A Simple Test of the Home-Market Effect
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Themes
Data
People
About

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us