Popular Acceptance of Inequality due to Brute Luck and Support for Classical Benefit-Based Taxation

Matthew Weinzierl

NBER Working Paper No. 22462
Issued in July 2016, Revised in October 2016
NBER Program(s):PE

U.S. survey respondents’ views on distributive justice are shown to differ in two specific, related ways from what is conventionally assumed in modern optimal tax research. A large share of respondents, and in some cases a large majority, resist the full equalization of inequality due to brute luck that standard analyses would recommend. Related, a similar share prefer a classical benefit-based logic for the assignment of taxes over the conventional logic of diminishing marginal social welfare. Moreover, these two views are linked: respondents who more strongly resist equalization are more likely to prefer the classical benefit-based principle. Together, these results suggest that a large share of the American public views the allocation of pre-tax incomes as relevant to optimal tax policy and—at least in part—justly deserved unless proven otherwise, judgments that are inconsistent with standard welfarist objectives.

You may purchase this paper on-line in .pdf format from ($5) for electronic delivery.

Access to NBER Papers

You are eligible for a free download if you are a subscriber, a corporate associate of the NBER, a journalist, an employee of the U.S. federal government with a ".GOV" domain name, or a resident of nearly any developing country or transition economy.

If you usually get free papers at work/university but do not at home, you can either connect to your work VPN or proxy (if any) or elect to have a link to the paper emailed to your work email address below. The email address must be connected to a subscribing college, university, or other subscribing institution. Gmail and other free email addresses will not have access.


Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w22462

Published: Matthew Weinzierl, 2017. "Popular Acceptance of Inequality due to Innate Brute Luck and Support for Classical Benefit-Based Taxation," Journal of Public Economics, .

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
Weinzierl w20735 Revisiting the Classical View of Benefit-Based Taxation
Levy, Norton, and Smith w22471 Tobacco Regulation and Cost-Benefit Analysis: How Should We Value Foregone Consumer Surplus?
Cohen, Ericson, Laibson, and White w22455 Measuring Time Preferences
Krueger, Mitman, and Perri w22458 On the Distribution of the Welfare Losses of Large Recessions
Li and Hall w22473 Depreciation of Business R&D Capital
NBER Videos

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email:

Contact Us