NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
loading...

Are Settlements in Patent Litigation Collusive? Evidence from Paragraph IV Challenges

Eric Helland, Seth A. Seabury

NBER Working Paper No. 22194
Issued in April 2016
NBER Program(s):Health Care, Health Economics, Law and Economics

The use of “pay-for-delay” settlements in patent litigation – in which a branded manufacturer and generic entrant settle a Paragraph IV patent challenge and agree to forestall entry – has come under considerable scrutiny in recent years. Critics argue that these settlements are collusive and lower consumer welfare by maintaining monopoly prices after patents should have expired, while proponents argue they reinforce incentives for innovation. We estimate the impact of settlements to Paragraph IV challenges on generic entry and evaluate the implications for drug prices and quantity. To address the potential endogeneity of Paragraph IV challenges and settlements we estimate the model using instrumental variables. Our instruments include standard measures of patent strength and a measure of settlement legality based on a split between several Circuit Courts of Appeal. We find that Paragraph IV challenges increase generic entry, lower drug prices and increase quantity, while settlements effectively reverse the effect. These effects persist over time, inflating price and depressing quantity for up to 5 years after the challenge. We also find that eliminating settlements would result in a relatively small reduction in research and development (R&D) expenditures.

download in pdf format
   (1002 K)

email paper

A non-technical summary of this paper is available in the July 2016 NBER digest.  You can sign up to receive the NBER Digest by email.

The NBER Bulletin on Aging and Health provides summaries of publications like this.  You can sign up to receive the NBER Bulletin on Aging and Health by email.

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w22194

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
Aguiar and Waldfogel w22675 Quality Predictability and the Welfare Benefits from New Products: Evidence from the Digitization of Recorded Music
Drake, Starr-McCluer, and McGuire w20292 Do "Reverse Payment" Settlements of Brand-Generic Patent Disputes in the Pharmaceutical Industry Constitute an Anticompetitive Pay for Delay?
Bulow The Gaming of Pharmaceutical Patents
Branstetter, Chatterjee, and Higgins w17188 Regulation and Welfare: Evidence from Paragraph IV Generic Entry in the Pharmaceutical Industry
de Rassenfosse, Jaffe, and Webster w22244 Low-quality Patents in the Eye of the Beholder: Evidence from Multiple Examiners
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Themes
Data
People
About

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us