Testing Models of Social Learning on Networks: Evidence from a Lab Experiment in the Field

Arun G. Chandrasekhar, Horacio Larreguy, Juan Pablo Xandri

NBER Working Paper No. 21468
Issued in August 2015
NBER Program(s):   DEV   LS   PR   TWP

Agents often use noisy signals from their neighbors to update their beliefs about a state of the world. The effectiveness of social learning relies on the details of how agents aggregate information from others. There are two prominent models of information aggregation in networks: (1) Bayesian learning, where agents use Bayes' rule to assess the state of the world and (2) DeGroot learning, where agents instead consider a weighted average of their neighbors' previous period opinions or actions. Agents who engage in DeGroot learning often double-count information and may not converge in the long run. We conduct a lab experiment in the field with 665 subjects across 19 villages in Karnataka, India, designed to structurally test which model best describes social learning. Seven subjects were placed into a network with common knowledge of the network structure. Subjects attempted to learn the underlying (binary) state of the world, having received independent identically distributed signals in the first period. Thereafter, in each period, subjects made guesses about the state of the world, and these guesses were transmitted to their neighbors at the beginning of the following round. We structurally estimate a model of Bayesian learning, relaxing common knowledge of Bayesian rationality by allowing agents to have incomplete information as to whether others are Bayesian or DeGroot. Our estimates show that, despite the flexibility in modeling learning in these networks, agents are robustly best described by DeGroot-learning models wherein they take a simple majority of previous guesses in their neighborhood.

You may purchase this paper on-line in .pdf format from ($5) for electronic delivery.

Access to NBER Papers

You are eligible for a free download if you are a subscriber, a corporate associate of the NBER, a journalist, an employee of the U.S. federal government with a ".GOV" domain name, or a resident of nearly any developing country or transition economy.

If you usually get free papers at work/university but do not at home, you can either connect to your work VPN or proxy (if any) or elect to have a link to the paper emailed to your work email address below. The email address must be connected to a subscribing college, university, or other subscribing institution. Gmail and other free email addresses will not have access.


Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w21468

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
Dubé, Luo, and Fang w21475 Self-Signaling and Prosocial Behavior: a Cause Marketing Mobile Field Experiment
Chakraborty and Kim w13828 Caste, Kinship and Sex Ratios in India
Grossman and Kim w6403 Human Capital and Predation: A Positive Theory of Educational Policy
Goldin and Katz w6144 Why the United States Led in Education: Lessons from Secondary School Expansion, 1910 to 1940
Beshears, Choi, Harris, Laibson, Madrian, and Sakong w21474 Self Control and Commitment: Can Decreasing the Liquidity of a Savings Account Increase Deposits?
NBER Videos

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email:

Contact Us