The Optimal Use of Government Purchases for Stabilization

Pascal Michaillat, Emmanuel Saez

NBER Working Paper No. 21322
Issued in July 2015
NBER Program(s):   EFG   PE

This paper describes the optimal level of government purchases in the presence of unemployment. The theoretical framework is a general-equilibrium matching model in which government purchases are valuable. When the unemployment gap is zero, the conventional Samuelson formula is valid. Otherwise, optimal government spending deviates from the Samuelson level to fill the unemployment gap partially. Hence, with a positive unemployment multiplier (so that increasing government purchases reduces unemployment), government spending should be higher than the Samuelson level when unemployment is inefficiently high and lower when unemployment is inefficiently low. We characterize the optimal level of stimulus spending. We find that stimulus spending is largest for a moderate unemployment multiplier. With larger multipliers, stimulus spending is smaller because less spending is required to fill the unemployment gap. With smaller multipliers, stimulus spending is smaller because there is more crowding out of private spending by public spending. We also find that stimulus spending increases with the elasticity of substitution between public and private consumption. With a zero elasticity (so that additional public workers dig and fill holes), stimulus spending is zero. With an infinite elasticity (so that private and public workers are perfect substitute), stimulus spending is large enough to fill the unemployment gap completely. Finally, the results hold whether taxes are nondistortionary or distortionary.

You may purchase this paper on-line in .pdf format from ($5) for electronic delivery.

Access to NBER Papers

You are eligible for a free download if you are a subscriber, a corporate associate of the NBER, a journalist, an employee of the U.S. federal government with a ".GOV" domain name, or a resident of nearly any developing country or transition economy.

If you usually get free papers at work/university but do not at home, you can either connect to your work VPN or proxy (if any) or elect to have a link to the paper emailed to your work email address below. The email address must be connected to a subscribing college, university, or other subscribing institution. Gmail and other free email addresses will not have access.


This paper was revised on October 12, 2016

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w21322

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
Acemoglu, Akcigit, and Kerr w21344 Networks and the Macroeconomy: An Empirical Exploration
Ghosh, Kim, Mendoza, Ostry, and Qureshi w16782 Fiscal Fatigue, Fiscal Space and Debt Sustainability in Advanced Economies
Adelino, Schoar, and Severino w21320 Loan Originations and Defaults in the Mortgage Crisis: Further Evidence
Lawrence w21296 Recent Declines in Labor's Share in US Income: A Preliminary Neoclassical Account
Aghion, Akcigit, Bergeaud, Blundell, and Hemous w21247 Innovation and Top Income Inequality
NBER Videos

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email:

Contact Us