A New Look at the U.S. Foreclosure Crisis: Panel Data Evidence of Prime and Subprime Borrowers from 1997 to 2012
NBER Working Paper No. 21261
Issued in June 2015
NBER Program(s):Asset Pricing, Corporate Finance, Economic Fluctuations and Growth, International Finance and Macroeconomics, Labor Studies, Monetary Economics, Public Economics, Political Economy
Utilizing new panel micro data on the ownership sequences of all types of borrowers from 1997-2012 leads to a reinterpretation of the U.S. foreclosure crisis as more of a prime, rather than a subprime, borrower issue. Moreover, traditional mortgage default factors associated with the economic cycle, such as negative equity, completely account for the foreclosure propensity of prime borrowers relative to all-cash owners, and for three-quarters of the analogous subprime gap. Housing traits, race, initial income, and speculators did not play a meaningful role, and initial leverage only accounts for a small variation in outcomes of prime and subprime borrowers.
A non-technical summary of this paper is available in the August 2015 NBER digest.
You can sign up to receive the NBER Digest by email.
Machine-readable bibliographic record -
Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w21261
Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
|Banks, Blundell, Oldfield, and Smith
||w21255 House Price Volatility and the Housing Ladder
|Hellerstein, Kutzbach, and Neumark
||w21262 Labor Market Networks and Recovery from Mass Layoffs: Evidence from the Great Recession Period
|Adelino, Schoar, and Severino
||w20848 Loan Originations and Defaults in the Mortgage Crisis: The Role of the Middle Class
||w21216 Job Loss in the Great Recession and its Aftermath: U.S. Evidence from the Displaced Workers Survey
||w20496 Household Debt: Facts, Puzzles, Theories, and Policies