Upcoding: Evidence from Medicare on Squishy Risk Adjustment
NBER Working Paper No. 21222
Issued in May 2015
NBER Program(s): AG HC HE PE
Upcoding—manipulation of patient diagnoses in order to game payment systems—has gained significant attention following the introduction of risk adjustment into US insurance markets. We provide new evidence that enrollees in private Medicare plans generate 6% to 16% higher diagnosis-based risk scores than they would generate under fee-for-service Medicare, where diagnoses do not affect payments. Our estimates imply upcoding generates billions of dollars in excess public spending annually and significant consumer choice distortions. We show that coding intensity increases with vertical integration, reflecting a principal-agent problem faced by insurers, who desire more intense coding from the physicians with whom they contract.
A non-technical summary of this paper is available in the September 2015 NBER digest.
You can sign up to receive the NBER Digest by email.
The NBER Bulletin on Aging and Health provides summaries of publications like this.
You can sign up to receive the NBER Bulletin on Aging and Health by email.
This paper was revised on October 27, 2015
Machine-readable bibliographic record -
Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w21222
Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
|Conti and Berndt
||w20016 Specialty drug prices and utilization after loss of U.S. patent exclusivity, 2001-2007
|Gruber and McKnight
||w20462 Controlling Health Care Costs Through Limited Network Insurance Plans: Evidence from Massachusetts State Employees
|Heller, Shah, Guryan, Ludwig, Mullainathan, and Pollack
||w21178 Thinking, Fast and Slow? Some Field Experiments to Reduce Crime and Dropout in Chicago
|Howard, Bach, Berndt, and Conti
||w20867 Pricing in the Market for Anticancer Drugs
|Haviland, Eisenberg, Mehrotra, Huckfeldt, and Sood
||w21031 Do âConsumer-Directedâ Health Plans Bend the Cost Curve Over Time?