Upcoding: Evidence from Medicare on Squishy Risk Adjustment
NBER Working Paper No. 21222
Issued in May 2015, Revised in October 2015
NBER Program(s):Aging, Health Care, Health Economics, Public Economics
Upcoding—manipulation of patient diagnoses in order to game payment systems—has gained significant attention following the introduction of risk adjustment into US insurance markets. We provide new evidence that enrollees in private Medicare plans generate 6% to 16% higher diagnosis-based risk scores than they would generate under fee-for-service Medicare, where diagnoses do not affect payments. Our estimates imply upcoding generates billions of dollars in excess public spending annually and significant consumer choice distortions. We show that coding intensity increases with vertical integration, reflecting a principal-agent problem faced by insurers, who desire more intense coding from the physicians with whom they contract.
A non-technical summary of this paper is available in the September 2015 NBER digest.
You can sign up to receive the NBER Digest by email.
The NBER Bulletin on Aging and Health provides summaries of publications like this.
You can sign up to receive the NBER Bulletin on Aging and Health by email.
Machine-readable bibliographic record -
Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w21222
Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
|Brown, Kowalski, and Lurie
||w20835 Medicaid as an Investment in Children: What is the Long-Term Impact on Tax Receipts?
|Heller, Shah, Guryan, Ludwig, Mullainathan, and Pollack
||w21178 Thinking, Fast and Slow? Some Field Experiments to Reduce Crime and Dropout in Chicago
|Gruber and McKnight
||w20462 Controlling Health Care Costs Through Limited Network Insurance Plans: Evidence from Massachusetts State Employees
|Howard, Bach, Berndt, and Conti
||w20867 Pricing in the Market for Anticancer Drugs
|Currie, MacLeod, and Van Parys
||w21218 Physician Practice Style and Patient Health Outcomes: The Case of Heart Attacks