The Use and Misuse of Models for Climate Policy

Robert S. Pindyck

NBER Working Paper No. 21097
Issued in April 2015
NBER Program(s):Environment and Energy Economics

In recent articles, I have argued that integrated assessment models (IAMs) have flaws that make them close to useless as tools for policy analysis. IAM-based analyses of climate policy create a perception of knowledge and precision that is illusory, and can fool policy-makers into thinking that the forecasts the models generate have some kind of scientific legitimacy. But some have claimed that we need some kind of model, and that IAMs can be structured and used in ways that correct for their shortcomings. For example, it has been argued that although we know little or nothing about key relationships in the model, we can get around this problem by attaching probability distributions to various parameters and then simulating the model using Monte Carlo methods. I argue that this would buy us nothing, and that a simpler and more transparent approach to the design of climate change policy is preferable. I briefly outline what that approach would look like.

You may purchase this paper on-line in .pdf format from ($5) for electronic delivery.

Access to NBER Papers

You are eligible for a free download if you are a subscriber, a corporate associate of the NBER, a journalist, an employee of the U.S. federal government with a ".GOV" domain name, or a resident of nearly any developing country or transition economy.

If you usually get free papers at work/university but do not at home, you can either connect to your work VPN or proxy (if any) or elect to have a link to the paper emailed to your work email address below. The email address must be connected to a subscribing college, university, or other subscribing institution. Gmail and other free email addresses will not have access.


Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w21097

Published: Robert S. Pindyck, 2017. "The Use and Misuse of Models for Climate Policy," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, vol 11(1), pages 100-114.

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
Pindyck w19244 Climate Change Policy: What Do the Models Tell Us?
Freeman, Wagner, and Zeckhauser w20900 Climate Sensitivity Uncertainty: When is Good News Bad?
Heal and Park w21119 Goldilocks Economies? Temperature Stress and the Direct Impacts of Climate Change
Borenstein and Bushnell w21113 The U.S. Electricity Industry After 20 Years of Restructuring
Hambel, Kraft, and Schwartz w21044 Optimal Carbon Abatement in a Stochastic Equilibrium Model with Climate Change
NBER Videos

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email:

Contact Us