NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

Good Rankings Are Bad: Why Reliable Rankings Can Hurt Consumers

Laurent Bouton, Georg Kirchsteiger

NBER Working Paper No. 21083
Issued in April 2015
NBER Program(s):Industrial Organization

Rankings have become increasingly popular on various markets, e.g. the market for study programs. We analyze their welfare implications. Consumers have to choose between two goods of unknown quality with exogenous presence or absence of an unbiased informative ranking. The existence of the ranking might affect the welfare of all consumers negatively. With rigid prices, the ranking induced change in demand can be detrimental to all consumers in markets featuring rationing or consumption externalities. With perfectly flexible prices, the ranking might increase firms' market power, and hence lead to losses for all consumers even in the absence of rationing and consumption externalities.

download in pdf format
   (231 K)

email paper

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w21083

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
Jin, Luca, and Martin w21099 Is No News (Perceived as) Bad News? An Experimental Investigation of Information Disclosure
Bernard, Moxnes, and Saito w21082 Production Networks, Geography and Firm Performance
Lo w21267 The Gordon Gekko Effect: The Role of Culture in the Financial Industry
Nosko and Tadelis w20830 The Limits of Reputation in Platform Markets: An Empirical Analysis and Field Experiment
Galetovic, Haber, and Levine w21090 An Empirical Examination of Patent Hold-up
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Themes
Data
People
About

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us