NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

The Impact of Consumer Inattention on Insurer Pricing in the Medicare Part D Program

Kate Ho, Joseph Hogan, Fiona Scott Morton

NBER Working Paper No. 21028
Issued in March 2015
NBER Program(s):   HC   IO

Medicare Part D presents a novel privatized structure for a government pharmaceutical benefit. Incentives for firms to provide low prices and high quality are generated by consumers who choose among multiple insurance plans in each market. To date the literature has primarily focused on consumers, and has calculated how much could be saved if choice frictions were removed. In this paper we take the next analytical step and consider how plans would adjust prices if consumer search behavior improved and consumers became more elastic. Margins should fall, leading to additional consumer and government savings. We estimate a model of consumer plan choice with inattentive consumers. We then turn to the supply side and examine insurer responses to this behavior. We show that high observed premiums are consistent with insurers profiting from consumer inertia. We use the demand parameters and a simple model of firm pricing to approximate how much lower steady state Part D plan premiums would be if consumers were attentive. Our estimates indicate that an average consumer could save over $1000 over three years when firms' lower markups are taken into account. Further, since the government pays three-quarters of the cost of the Part D program, government expenditures would also fall. Our simulations indicate the government could save $1.3 billion over three years, or 1% of the cost of subsidizing the relevant enrollees.

You may purchase this paper on-line in .pdf format from SSRN.com ($5) for electronic delivery.

Access to NBER Papers

You are eligible for a free download if you are a subscriber, a corporate associate of the NBER, a journalist, an employee of the U.S. federal government with a ".GOV" domain name, or a resident of nearly any developing country or transition economy.

If you usually get free papers at work/university but do not at home, you can either connect to your work VPN or proxy (if any) or elect to have a link to the paper emailed to your work email address below. The email address must be connected to a subscribing college, university, or other subscribing institution. Gmail and other free email addresses will not have access.

E-mail:

A non-technical summary of this paper is available in the August 2015 NBER digest.  You can sign up to receive the NBER Digest by email.

The NBER Bulletin on Aging and Health provides summaries of publications like this.  You can sign up to receive the NBER Bulletin on Aging and Health by email.

This paper was revised on February 13, 2017

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w21028

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Allin, Baker, Isabelle, and Stabile w21022 Physician Incentives and the Rise in C-sections: Evidence from Canada
Ferreira and Gyourko w21261 A New Look at the U.S. Foreclosure Crisis: Panel Data Evidence of Prime and Subprime Borrowers from 1997 to 2012
Gelman, Kariv, Shapiro, Silverman, and Tadelis w21025 How Individuals Smooth Spending: Evidence from the 2013 Government Shutdown Using Account Data
Abaluck, Gruber, and Swanson w20976 Prescription Drug Use under Medicare Part D: A Linear Model of Nonlinear Budget Sets
Duggan and Scott Morton w13917 The Effect of Medicare Part D on Pharmaceutical Prices and Utilization
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Themes
Data
People
About

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us