NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

Matching Methods in Practice: Three Examples

Guido Imbens

NBER Working Paper No. 19959
Issued in March 2014
NBER Program(s):Labor Studies

There is a large theoretical literature on methods for estimating causal effects under unconfoundedness, exogeneity, or selection--on--observables type assumptions using matching or propensity score methods. Much of this literature is highly technical and has not made inroads into empirical practice where many researchers continue to use simple methods such as ordinary least squares regression even in settings where those methods do not have attractive properties. In this paper I discuss some of the lessons for practice from the theoretical literature, and provide detailed recommendations on what to do. I illustrate the recommendations with three detailed applications.

download in pdf format
   (352 K)

email paper

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w19959

Published: Guido W. Imbens, 2015. "Matching Methods in Practice: Three Examples," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 50(2), pages 373-419. citation courtesy of

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
Imbens and Wooldridge w14251 Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation
Gelman and Imbens w19614 Why ask Why? Forward Causal Inference and Reverse Causal Questions
Abadie and Imbens w15301 Matching on the Estimated Propensity Score
Imbens w19983 Instrumental Variables: An Econometrician's Perspective
Solon, Haider, and Wooldridge w18859 What Are We Weighting For?
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Themes
Data
People
About

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us