NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

Under the Thumb of History? Political Institutions and the Scope for Action

Abhijit Banerjee, Esther Duflo

NBER Working Paper No. 19848
Issued in January 2014
NBER Program(s):   POL

This paper discusses the two leading views of history and political institutions. For some scholars, institutions are mainly products of historical logic, while for others, accidents, leaders, and decisions have a significant impact. We argue that while there is clear evidence that history matters and has long-term effects, there is not enough data to help us distinguish between the two views. Faced with this uncertainty, what is a social scientist to do? We argue that given the possibility that policy decisions indeed make a difference, it makes sense to assume they do and to try to improve policymaking.

download in pdf format
   (212 K)

email paper

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w19848

Published: Abhijit V. Banerjee & Esther Duflo, 2014. "Under the Thumb of History? Political Institutions and the Scope for Action," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 6(1), pages 951-971, 08. citation courtesy of

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
Bordo, Markiewicz, and Jonung w17380 A Fiscal Union for the Euro: Some Lessons from History
Acemoglu, Gallego, and Robinson w19933 Institutions, Human Capital and Development
Alesina and Giuliano w19750 Culture and Institutions
Leonard w1327 Splitting Blacks?: Affirmative Action and Earnings Inequality within and Across Races
Benhassine, Devoto, Duflo, Dupas, and Pouliquen w19227 Turning a Shove into a Nudge? A "Labeled Cash Transfer" for Education
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Themes
Data
People
About

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us