NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

An Analysis of the Selection of Arbitrators

David E. Bloom, Christopher L. Cavanagh

NBER Working Paper No. 1938
Issued in June 1986
NBER Program(s):   LS

This paper analyses data on union and employer rankings of different panels of arbitrators in an actual arbitration system. A random utility model of bargainer preferences is developed and estimated. The estimates indicate that unions and employers have similar preferences, in favor of lawyers, more experienced arbitrators, and arbitrators who seem to have previously favored their side. Alternative rankings models, which are estimated to test whether bargainers rank arbitrators strategically, reveal no evidence of strategic behavior.

download in pdf format
   (378 K)

download in djvu format
   (272 K)

email paper

This paper is available as PDF (378 K) or DjVu (272 K) (Download viewer) or via email.

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w1938

Published: Bloom, David E. and Christopher Cavanagh. "An Analysis of the Selection of Arbitrators," American Economic Review, June 1986, pp. 408-422. citation courtesy of

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
Ashenfelter and Bloom w1149 Models of Arbitrator Behavior: Theory and Evidence
Bloom and Cavanagh w2211 Negotiator Behavior Under Arbitration
Bloom w1841 Empirical Models of Arbitrator Behavior Under Conventional Arbitration
Farber and Bazerman w1488 The General Basis of Arbitrator Behavior: An Empirical Analysis of Conventional and Final-Offer Arbitration
Chang and Velasco w6606 Financial Crises in Emerging Markets
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Data
People
About

Support
National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us