NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

Carbon Taxes vs. Cap and Trade: A Critical Review

Lawrence H. Goulder, Andrew Schein

NBER Working Paper No. 19338
Issued in August 2013
NBER Program(s):EEE, PE

We examine the relative attractions of a carbon tax, a "pure" cap-and-trade system, and a "hybrid" option (a cap-and-trade system with a price ceiling and/or price floor). We show that the various options are equivalent along more dimensions than often are recognized. In addition, we bring out important dimensions along which the approaches have very different impacts. Several of these dimensions have received little attention in prior literature.

A key finding is that exogenous emissions pricing (whether through a carbon tax or through the hybrid option) has a number of attractions over pure cap and trade. Beyond helping prevent price volatility and reducing expected policy errors in the face of uncertainties, exogenous pricing helps avoid problematic interactions with other climate policies and helps avoid large wealth transfers to oil exporting countries.

download in pdf format
   (331 K)

email paper

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w19338

Published: LAWRENCE H. GOULDER and ANDREW R. SCHEIN, Clim. Change Econ. 04, 1350010 (2013)

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
Metcalf w14375 Designing A Carbon Tax to Reduce U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions
List and Price w19289 Using Field Experiments in Environmental and Resource Economics
Aldy and Stavins w17569 The Promise and Problems of Pricing Carbon: Theory and Experience
Pindyck w19244 Climate Change Policy: What Do the Models Tell Us?
Scotchmer Cap-and-Trade, Emissions Taxes, and Innovation
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Themes
Data
People
About

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us