NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

The Sources of Disagreement Among International Macro Models and Implications for Policy Coordination

Jeffrey A. Frankel

NBER Working Paper No. 1925
Issued in May 1986
NBER Program(s):   ITI   IFM

This paper makes use of the simulation results of 12 leading large international econometric models, as to the effects of commonly specified changes in monetary and fiscal policy, conducted under the Brookings exercise "Empirical Macroeconomics for Interdependent Economies." The first half of the paper examines disagreement among the models on the signs of policy multipliers, and how such disagreement compares to the ambiguities appearing in the theoretical literature. There turns out to be relatively little disagreement as to the effects on output, prices and the exchange rate. The greatest disagreement is rather over the question whether a monetary expansion worsens or improves the current account. The second half of the paper examines the implications for internationa lmacroeconomic policy coordination. The existing literature makes the unrealistic assumption that policy-makers all know the true model, from whichit follows that the Nash bargaining solution is in general superior to the Nash competitive solution. But everything changes once we recognize that policy-makers' models, as the models in the Brookings simulations, differ from each other and therefore from the "true" model. When the central bank and fiscal authorities subscribe to conflicting models, it is still true that(1) the competitive equilibrium is sub-optimal, and that (2) the two authorities will in general be able to agree on a cooperative policy package that each believes will improve the objective function; however, (3) the bargaining solution is as likely to move the target variables in the wrong direction as in the right direction, in the light of a third true model. Out of 1,210possible combinations of different models subscribed to by the two policy authorities and models representing reality, bargaining raises welfare in only 819 cases. The conclusion is that disagreement as to the true model maybe a more serious obstacle to successful policy coordination than is institutional failure to enforce Pareto-improving solutions.

download in pdf format
   (795 K)

download in djvu format
   (638 K)

email paper

This paper is available as PDF (795 K) or DjVu (638 K) (Download viewer) or via email.

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w1925

Published:

  • Frankel, Jeffrey A. "The Implications Of Mean-Variance Optimization For Four Questions In International Macroeconomics," Journal of International Money and Finance, 1986, v5(Supp), S53-S75. ,
  • as "Ambiguous Policy Multipliers in Theory and in Empirical Models" in Empirical Macroeconomics for Interdependent Economies, Ralph C. Bryant et al (eds) D.C., Brookings, April 1988. ,
  • as "The Implications of Conflicting Models for Coordination Between Monetary and Fiscal Policy-Makers," In Empirical Macroeconomics for Interdependent Economies, eds., Ralph Bryant, et al. (Brookings Institution Press: Washington, D.C.), May 1988. ,
  • in Frankel, Jeffrey A. "Financial Markets and Monetary Policy." The MIT Press (July 13, 1995)

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these:
McCallum and Nelson Performance of Operational Policy Rules in an Estimated Semiclassical Structural Model
Frankel and Rockett w2059 International Macroeconomic Policy Coordination When Policy-Makers Disagree on the Model
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
Data
People
About

Support
National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us